| |
1990: JABIRU
COMMUNITY RESIDENCY – Jabiru – Kakadu
National Park
Seven weeks Gunbalunya Oenpelli Community
Artist in residence: Debra Batton |
|
Work : Director's Notes : Venue : Creative
Personnel |
|
Work |
|
Jabiru is a mining town approximately
2.5 hours from Darwin within the Kakadu National Park.
On request from the Jabiru Arts Council (John Carrigen)
a holiday dance program was run in September 1989 that
led to the 1990 residency.
Oenpelli is an Aboriginal
settlement in Arnhem Land, a 1.5-hour drive from
Jabiru and isolated by the flooding
river during the wet season.
Guest artist Debra Batton (from Melbourne) took part in a six month community
residency in Darwin with the
Brown’s Mart Dance program and directed the Thru
Moves project. In addition Debra directed this residency.
|
|
|
Director's
Notes |
| |
Although a little daunted at spending
seven weeks in a mining town, I was interested in this
dance project as it was flexible and new. I enjoyed
the opportunity to spend three days in the Aboriginal
community of Oenpelli, giving dance classes in the
school, which were greatly appreciated by that isolated
community.
|
| |
In Jabiru classes were given to 75 participants
over 6 different classes: 3 year olds, 4-7’s,
7-11’s, teenagers, adults, acrobatics. |
| |
All classes were attended by a regular
group with a few participants joining in for one-off
sessions. Most participants paid a ‘term fee’ ensuring
the regularity of a core group in all classes. Some
paid on a weekly basis to encourage tentative participants
and some of the teenagers not supported by their parents. |
| |
During the first week some classes were
run in the school. This allowed students to try out
a dance class without commitment. These were very successful,
promoting the dance project and we gained new participants
in the after school dance program. |
| |
The acrobatic classes were instigated
after I discovered the Gymnastics equipment available
at the school. Many people expressed an interest in
this option. Gymnastics had been an after school activity
until the teacher moved away and the activity ceased. |
| |
The majority of participants were female,
except in the acrobatics, which were 50/50. In the
teenagers’ groups one male Aboriginal participant
showed delightful natural talent. We also integrated
Jackie (a 15 year old Downs Syndrome student) who participated
in the classes and performance with ease. |
|

|
|
Venue |
| |
The drop in centre was the venue for
most of the dance classes except for one adult class
that was held in the school. The Drop In Centre was
adequate but not particularly comfortable or helpful.
It did have air-conditioning and a wooden floor, but
was too small with pool tables, internal walls and
metal strips on the floor, all of which decreased the
dance space. It was also very dark. Despite these drawbacks,
it was all that was available. (The community hall
had a concrete floor and was too expensive, although
more spacious.)
The acrobatics classes were conducted in the school in an open area – a
concrete floor, but plenty of space and with the school’s help
we did not have to hire it. |
| |
Performances: |
| |
The teenagers performed two dances
in conjunction with the school play, which took the
format of a theatre restaurant. This worked well; the
two styles of melodrama and contemporary dance are
not a combination I would have chosen for aesthetic
compatibility. They supported each other on a practical
level, sharing the venue and publicity and an audience
of approximately 100 people over two nights. The event
was held in the community hall with a very small stage.
The area was increased with portable staging from the
sports club. The portable stage was still too small
for a dance with 12 teenagers. It also separated when
the dancers moved but was held together by willing
stagehands. Despite the size of the stage and its instability,
the dancers thoroughly enjoyed being up there. |
|
The 7-11 year age group performed during
the day at the dress rehearsal for the school with
many parents in attendance. This performance was not
included in the evening performance as the atmosphere
was not appropriate. |
| |
The Wind Festival, held on an outdoor
grass area at sunset, was a colourful event. The dancers
seemed a little insecure without the more defined space
of a stage. However, the two groups performed again
remarkably well. Many parents expressed delight in
seeing their children perform as part of this day.
|
| |
As I was based in Darwin at the time
and for several weeks preceding the event, opportunities
to rehearse with the two groups were limited. A teacher
from the school organized rehearsals to ensure the
dancers were confident to perform. I made it back to
Jabiru for two weekends for rehearsals and was there
to support them on the day. |
|

|
| |
Support: |
| |
The Jabiru Arts Council were very supportive,
especially john Carrigen (Librarian). He was very flexible
and allowed timetable changes according to participants’ needs.
He also welcomed me in social activities and assisted
me being accepted into the community. |
|
The school was also extremely helpful
and supportive. The Principal, Kay Aldenhonen (Also
Arts Council) was wiling to assist in anything from
administrative to practical tasks such as providing
room and announcements. The secretarial staff contributed
in various ways including making certificates for all
participants. |
| |
The Arts Council supported my decision
to have the two groups perform for the Wind Festival.
Their assistance in organizing rehearsals when I was
able to get out there was crucial. |
| |
The school and council were also supportive
of bringing the Jabiru dancers to Darwin to perform
in Thru Moves. However, the practicalities of this
became too difficult without enough parental support
(particularly the teenagers’ group) for whom
I thought the experience would be most beneficial.
|
|

|
| |
Oenpelli: |
| |
I was invited to give dance workshops
to children and teachers from the Oenpelli School.
I held a workshop in the classroom with ten girls aged
6-16. Three teachers also participated and encouraged
the students to move away from the walls. |
| |
It was a difficult session, my first
experience of the very self-conscious, “shame” attitude
of Aboriginal people. The age range was difficult,
as I had to provide a suitable dance experience for
all participants in one session, this proved very challenging.
By the end of the hour the participants danced but
I was unsure as to how positive the experience was.
However the teacher expressed enthusiasm and arranged
for my return. |
|
The second visit was held as part of
the school day. I conducted sessions fro each grade
(levels 0-6) with 45 minutes each. The pre-schoolers
started the day, the secondary girls finished. This
full day was very tiring, but much more successful,
due to the appropriateness of working with a group
of the same age who felt comfortable with each other. |
| |
The third day was a repeat of the second
and more successful again as the children were more
familiar with me and I with them. It became obvious
that a series of workshops where a trusting relationship
between dancer/teacher and the students development
could be a positive dance experience for all. The importance
of being an ongoing activity rather than a series of
one off activities. |
| |
I gained a great deal from the experience
and would be interested in a longer residency in Oenpelli. |
|

|
| |
Artistically: |
| |
I attempted to be open with each group
and meet their needs or desires in dance. |
| |
The Adults’ classes tended to
be a modern dance technique class with some compositional
elements and a small amount of contact and improvisation.
They
expressed no desire to perform. |
| |
The teenagers’ classes became
more compositional as it became clear that they wanted
to perform. They were very enthusiastic about improvisation
and we explored themes and structures and eventually
used these to create a performance piece. At the same
time they expressed a desire to learn a dance and this
included steps which I taught and steps which they
created on their chosen theme, ‘growing
up’. Six weeks was not really long enough for a thorough exploration of
the theme or for the ‘perfection’ of the product. This group performed
three times and it was wonderful to see their confidence increase by the third
performance. |
| |
Unfortunately time and resources did
not allow us to create costumes although the dancers
were eager to do this. The improvisation work included
each dancer holding a silk scarf. These were bought
by the arts council from Duluk Duluk which is an Aboriginal
printing workshop in Jabiru. It was good to extend
the
project into the community in this small way. |
| |
The 7-11 year olds were also enthusiastic
about performing and we worked together to create their
dance. Their classes included dance exercises and creative
movement. This group performed for the school (dress
rehearsal) and at the Wind Festival. |
|
The 4-7’s class tended to be
more creative movement and movement games. Although
I am sure they would have been willing to perform I
decided that the process of rehearsing the same dance
would have been less beneficial and enjoyable than
a more creative week-by-week format. |
| |
The 3 year olds class was creative
movement including some gymnastics tumbles
and sing‘n’dance activities. The parents often joined in, especially
in the first weeks. The class time was perhaps too long: 45 minutes is plenty
for this age group. |
| |
The acrobatic group learned some partner
balances, gymnastics tumbling and the ever favorite
mini-trampoline with crash mat. If more time was available
it would have been good to have devised a performance
piece of acrobatics. |
|

|
| |
Follow up: |
| |
A follow up would be very worthwhile,
especially an event that involved more groups from
within the community from the outset. There are two
local bands
in Jabiru with whom I talked to regarding creating music for the dances.
However, they did not feel confident with this idea over the limited time
available. It would be exciting to develop a project with a musician and
designer to work with the existing groups and to collaborate with a choreographer
on a performance project. This would extend the project into the wider community,
perhaps culminating in an extravaganza at the Wind Festival. |
| |
As a guest dancer in residence I enjoyed
the challenge of working in a mining town that is almost
in a National park with the unique qualities and difficulties
that this creates. I have been affected by this opportunity to experience Aboriginal
culture and the bewildering landscapes of the Northern Territory. The spiritual
connection between the people and land being an area I am thirsty to know more
about, and I look forward to exploring this in my future choreographic work. |
|

|
|
Creative
Personnel |
| |
Debra Iris Batton CV |
| |
Debra joined 'Legs On The Wall' in 1996
performing in 'All of Me' at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival.
She co-devised and performed in 'Under the Influence'
and 'Home Land' and during 1998 was appointed Artistic
Coordinator of the Company.
Debra performed in and co-devised Legs on the Wall’s first international
production Flying Blind which premiered in Canada in 2001. In 2002 Debra made
her directorial debut with Legs on the Wall with Runner up.
|
| |
In 2004 she was Legs’ Director
on Eora Crossing (Sydney Festival) and co-directed Back
in your Box, a co-production for Australian Theater for
Young People. Prior to 1996 she performed as an acrobat,
aerialist, tumbler and clown with Circus Oz for three
years, touring South America, USA and Europe. |
| |
Debra studied contemporary dance at Victoria
University (Rusden) and in her career as a performing
artist has worked in a professional capacity as a choreographer,
dancer, director, co-devisor and actor. Debra worked
with Storm In A tea Cup Dance Theatre (Melbourne: artistic
Director David McMicken), Darwin Community Arts and dance
program, Magpie Theatre and State Theatre Company of
South Australia. |
|

|
|